Start with the commercial job the provider has to solve
A trades website usually has a straightforward commercial job: show the work, establish trust quickly and make it easy for a local customer to call or request a quote.
Write that objective into the brief before requesting proposals. It gives every shortlisted provider the same starting point and makes vague feature lists easier to challenge.
Compare the proposal line by line
| Compare | Ask before signing |
|---|---|
| Service pages | Are the main jobs split into useful service pages? |
| Areas served | How will genuine service areas be represented without creating thin town-name pages? |
| Mobile calls | Are phone and quote actions prominent for mobile visitors? |
| Project proof | Can real project images and reviews be added cleanly? |
| Lead forms | Does the form collect enough detail without becoming a barrier? |
| Ownership | Who controls the domain, hosting and website after launch? |
The sector-specific issue your shortlist should understand
Trades buyers often decide quickly. Clear services, coverage, proof of work, contact options and availability information usually matter more than complex animation.
Ask the provider to explain how this changes its recommended scope. A useful answer should affect the actual pages, campaigns, content, tracking or workflow being proposed.
Ask for proof that matches the work you are buying
Inspect the provider's live service-business sites on a phone and test the call or quote route yourself.
Proof should help you evaluate capability, not pressure you into a decision. Where client data cannot be shared, a provider can still demonstrate its process, live owned properties, sample deliverables or anonymised implementation detail without inventing results.
Agree ownership and access before work begins
Clarify which accounts, domains, platforms, analytics properties, creative files and source data belong to your business. You should also know what remains accessible if you change supplier later. Ownership is easiest to agree before the first invoice is paid.
Make reporting answer a buying question
Ask what the provider will report and which decisions those numbers will change. A useful report should connect activity to the objective in the brief, whether that is qualified enquiries, bookings, quote requests, purchases, visibility for priority commercial pages or another defined outcome.
Watch for this red flag
Choose the provider that can explain what is not needed yet
A strong proposal does not have to be the biggest one. The provider should be able to separate essential first-stage work from items that can wait until there is evidence to justify them. That is often a better sign of commercial judgement than a long feature list.
Put Kydos into your shortlist
Compare the published Kydos scope against the providers you are already speaking to, then request a focused quote if the fit looks right.
See Kydos Web DesignFrequently asked questions
What should I compare between web design providers?
Compare the exact deliverables, responsibility split, approval process, ownership, reporting, support and the commercial outcome the provider is expected to improve.
Should I choose a specialist agency for trades and home-service businesses?
Specialist experience can help, but it is not enough on its own. Check whether the provider understands your buying journey, can implement the required work and communicates the scope clearly.
Should I ask for a proposal before hiring?
Yes. Give shortlisted providers the same brief so you can compare assumptions, exclusions, deliverables and commercial terms on a like-for-like basis.
What is a warning sign when comparing agencies?
A quote includes dozens of local pages but no explanation of how those pages will differ or help a customer choose the business.
What proof should I ask to see?
Inspect the provider's live service-business sites on a phone and test the call or quote route yourself.
How can I compare Kydos with another provider?
Use Kydos' published service and pricing pages as one benchmark, then compare the other proposal against the same questions on scope, implementation, ownership and support.